Tom provides the basics of the stock preparation business with hand
tools. I am sure most of us work pretty well to this scheme.
I would add a couple of points and ask a question.
1 I work against a stop, rather than between stops, so the board is
free to move during planing. This requires that the ends be close to
square to the length first. It also means that the sides have to be
roughly square to the faces.
2 I would cut the boards down to the rough length first - long
boards are harder to plane than shorter boards.
3 I prefer to do each step (as outlined by Tom) to all the boards
before moving on to the next step.
4 The question. Do people use the mullet method? It seems to me that
having a good line on the edge and planing down to that line is much
better. I work the scrub to a few scrub thickness of the line, then
the jack to a few jack shavings of the line, then the smoother. The
last smoother stroke removes the top of the mark (an ideal I shoot
for, but never achieve for the full length of the board, but at this
point the shavings are pretty thin so the errors small.) Near the end
I can flip up the board and see how I am doing along the full length
and react (remove the high spots) accordingly. If the first thing you
do is remove the gauge marks it seems to me it must be much harder to
check your progress.
Aside from the big ideas in dimensions stock (face, edge, ...) I think
some of these smaller ideas are also important and would be interested
in other's approaches to these details.
Brent
T&J Holloway wrote:
> ...
> 1) Make one Face of the board flat and smooth. This becomes the 1st
> ...
> Others can chime in regarding use of a 'mullet' to check thickness
> and other ancient practices, but this should give you a place to start.
|